Many are trying trying to associate the two.
More are even proving its true.
Yet many are also adamant to do only one and not both.

I could not define both in as much as it is worth to be define. In real essence, we can just disclose it as the most common words of today yet the most undefined (HUH?) or can we just say the over defined and confusing words there is?

I have what others experience and define as love.
Though I somehow feel that lust will follow after feeling the deeper meaning of love...its just so...we need to revert to the idea that if you love you also have the intensity of wanting to be with your partner in the most intimate way. Is that so?

Never will I consider that lust can be define as the expression of love through the satisfaction of the flesh. Though, I must admit that the tingling of ones flesh when you get close to someone you "love" will be leading to a deeper intimacy. Many will agree on this to the highest level of shouting it out in the most common way : "we can't help it....we just need to do it....we could not hold it".....blah...blah..blah.

This blog can be like the others, but as common as it is, there's only one reason why I have this posted: I have for the life of me, tried to go beyond the norms... and it is not the same...without the other....

We cannot just separate both mind and body. That's difficult for sure. But the hardest part is to separate both from what the heart felt.